Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap WATCH to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LISTEN to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LATEST NEWS to start the live stream.

LISTEN
Watch
on air now

Create a 2GB account today!

You can now log in once to listen live, watch live, join competitions, enjoy exclusive 2GB content and other benefits.


Joining is free and easy.

You will soon need to register to keep streaming 2GB online. Register an account or skip for now to do it later.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Social media ban pointless without broader protections

Mike Jeffreys

Mike talks with Zaun Bhana, Technology Strategist and Managing Director of Leap Consulting, about the government’s proposed social media ban.

Choosing the right age to allow children to access social media fails to go far enough to address how far behind we are in protecting those same kids from digital harm, says Mr Bhana.

The Online Safety Act (2021) gives the eSafety Commissioner powers to react and remove harmful content, but unlike the UK’s Online Safety Act (2023), it doesn’t address critical areas deemed as lawful but harmful to children such as disinformation, porn and gambling.

Significantly, the UK approach places emphasis on age assurance to protect children from harmful content.

This includes requiring platforms to implement approved age verification or age assurance mechanisms to ensure that children do not encounter harmful or inappropriate content (such as pornography or violence).

Given that the average age children are first seeing pornography is 13, we must make the right changes now.

Download this podcast here

Mike Jeffreys
Advertisement